While the USDA did order states to provide detailed personal records for SNAP recipients, there is no evidence the directive required transferring this data to ICE.
The USDA has ordered all states to hand over the Names addresses social security numbers and benefit amounts to ICE by the end of July.

The Usda Wants States to Hand Over Food Stamp Data by the End of July
Source: laist.com
Key Evidence
The USDA issued a directive in May 2025 requiring states to provide detailed records, including Social Security numbers and addresses, for SNAP recipients to monitor program integrity.
There is no official USDA documentation indicating that this SNAP data was ordered to be transferred to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Federal courts issued temporary restraining orders blocking the USDA's data collection in 21 states as of September 2025.
What the Evidence Shows
In May 2025, the U.S. Department of Agriculture issued a directive requiring states to submit comprehensive records regarding Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program recipients, including names, home addresses, Social Security numbers, and benefit amounts.usda.govusda.govSecretary Rollins Requires States Provide Records Snap Benefits Ensure Lawful...The Data Demand: In May 2025, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a directive requiring states to provide the federal government with detailed records of SNAP recipients and applicants dating back to 2020 Concerns: The USDA... The department stated that this collection effort was intended to bolster program integrity, increase transparency, and address potential waste, fraud, and abuse in federally funded state programs.
fna.usda.govfna.usda.govProgram Integrity Data PreliminaryConcerns: The USDA stated that the data collection was intended to increase transparency, ensure program integrity, and combat "waste, fraud, and abuse" by giving the federal government better oversight of federally funded state programs...+1 more
By mid-2025, this mandate faced significant resistance and legal challenges from multiple states, eventually leading to federal court orders that blocked the collection of this data in at least 21 states by September 2025.cbsnews.comcbsnews.comDoj Lawsuit Michigan Minnesota Kentucky Pennsylvania Snap DataMultiple states refused to comply with the order, leading to lawsuits
statescoop.comstatescoop.comJudge Blocks Usda Collection of Snap Data in 21 StatesIn September 2025, a federal court issued a temporary restraining order preventing the USDA from collecting this data in several states The implementation of this order was subsequently challenged and blocked in various jurisdictions by... The claim that these records were ordered to be shared with Immigration and Customs Enforcement conflates the USDA’s broad data-collection directive with the administration's separate immigration enforcement agenda.
While the controversy emerged alongside intense public debate regarding data-sharing, the USDA did not formally authorize or announce a transfer of this specific SNAP data to ICE.apnews.comapnews.comImmigration Deportation Snap Trump Usda 8da2d74038ede32b65059f96c07a50efThe claim that the USDA ordered states to hand over the personal information of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is partially accurate in its description of the data...
vertexaisearch.cloud.google.comvertexaisearch.cloud.google.comVertexaisearch ReportThe claim that the data was specifically ordered to be handed over to ICE connects the USDA's broad data-collection effort to the administration's broader immigration enforcement agenda, a link the administration did not formally state but... Independent reporting and legal analysis have clarified that the connection to immigration authorities remains an assertion of external observers rather than an official component of the USDA's integrity-focused data request.+1 more
Verified Sources9
Program Integrity Data Preliminary
Immigration Deportation Snap Trump Usda 8da2d74038ede32b65059f96c07a50ef
Revision history
- Version 2September 18, 2026
The original check failed to distinguish between the USDA's broad data-collection directive for program integrity and the unsubstantiated claim that this data was explicitly for transfer to ICE. New evidence clarifies that the USDA order existed but did not include an ICE transfer mandate, rendering the previous verdict of 'Mostly True' incorrect.
Mostly True → Misleading - Version 1July 22, 2025
Initial published version
Mostly True