There is no definitive evidence to confirm that the Trump administration as a whole systematically broke laws, though it faced numerous legal challenges and lawsuits.
Trump administration breaking some laws.

Litigation Tracker: Legal Challenges to Trump Administration Actions
Source: justsecurity.org
Key Evidence
The Trump administration faced numerous lawsuits challenging its executive actions.
justsecurity.orgjustsecurity.orgLitigation Tracker: Legal Challenges to Trump Administration Actions
en.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.orgDonald Trump
It also engaged in legal battles such as suing New York City over sanctuary city laws (,
jurist.orgjurist.orgTrump administration sues New York City over sanctuary city laws - JURIST
documentedny.comdocumentedny.comTrump Administration Escalates Conflict With NYC Over Sanctuary Laws) and launching investigations into universities.
cnn.comcnn.comTrump administration launches investigation into Duke University and Duke Law...
wxii12.comwxii12.comTrump administration launches investigation into Duke University and Duke Law...
However, these actions represent contested legal and political issues rather than proven illegal conduct.
What the Evidence Shows
The claim that the Trump administration was breaking some laws is broad and lacks specificity. The administration faced over 300 lawsuits challenging various executive actions, indicating significant legal disputes but not conclusive proof of illegal activity by the administration itself. Many of these cases involved constitutional questions, policy disputes, or challenges to executive orders rather than clear-cut illegal acts.
For example, the administration sued New York City over sanctuary city laws, and it launched investigations into institutions like Duke University, actions which are within governmental authority but subject to legal scrutiny. Additionally, discussions about constitutional crises and separation of powers highlight political and legal tensions rather than confirmed lawbreaking. Without specific allegations or judicial findings confirming illegal conduct, the claim remains unverified.