Trump and House Republicans' budget cuts seek to eliminate the HOME affordable housing program that’s built/rehabbed 1.3M homes in 30 yrs, including 540k in rural areas. 84% of those homes are in districts that voted for him. Rural families now face losing their lifeline.

The HOME Investment Partnerships Program is documented by multiple sources as having helped build or rehabilitate around 1.3 million homes over the past 30 years, with approximately 540,000 of those homes located in rural areas.fortune.comfortune.com'Just another nail in the coffin for rural areas': Affordable housing program...apnews.comapnews.comTrump wants to ax an affordable housing grant that's a lifeline for many rural...

Several sources cite an Associated Press (AP) analysis indicating that about 84% of these homes are in districts that voted for Trump in recent elections, highlighting the political geography of the program's impact.hallaback.comhallaback.com‘Just another nail in the coffin for rural areas’: Affordable housing program...yankton.netyankton.netTrump wants to ax an affordable housing grant that's a lifeline for many rural...+1 more

The Trump administration's FY26 budget request includes proposals to eliminate or deeply cut funding for the HOME program along with other housing and social assistance programs, which would significantly reduce support for affordable housing initiatives nationwide, including rural communities.cbpp.orgcbpp.orgTrump Budget Deeply Cuts Health, Housing, Other Assistance for Low- and...nlihc.orgnlihc.orgTrump Administration Releases Additional Details of FY26 Budget Request Slashing...

Personal stories and local reporting underscore the importance of the HOME program as a lifeline for rural families facing housing affordability challenges.taylorvilledailynews.comtaylorvilledailynews.comTrump wants to ax an affordable housing grant that’s a lifeline for many rural...

While the exact phrasing "seeks to eliminate" aligns with the budget proposal's intent, final congressional appropriations could differ; however, the proposal itself clearly targets deep cuts or elimination.

The claim that rural families face losing their lifeline is supported by expert and community perspectives emphasizing the critical role of HOME funding in these areas.