The latest court action did the opposite: on Aug. 26, 2026, a federal judge lifted the nationwide injunction, allowing the Postal Service to proceed for now. The provided sources do not report a new 14-day hold after final rules.
A federal judge has again temporarily blocked Trump’s new mail-voting restrictions, issuing a 14-day hold after the Postal Service finalized its rules.

Judge Allows Postal Service Effort to Restrict Mail Voting, for Now - The New York Times
Source: nytimes.com
Key Evidence
The latest reported ruling, issued Aug. 26, 2026, lifted the nationwide injunction and allowed the Postal Service to proceed with the restrictions for now.
Earlier court action did block key parts of President Trump’s order, but the Supreme Court paused that ruling and the district judge later lifted the freeze.
None of the provided sources reports a new 14-day hold after the Postal Service finalized its rules.
What the Evidence Shows
The most recent reporting says a federal judge in Massachusetts lifted the remaining nationwide block on Aug. 26, 2026. That ruling allowed the Postal Service to move forward, at least temporarily, with the Trump administration’s mail-voting restrictions ahead of the November midterm elections. The New York Times, NPR, The Hill, ABC News and Politico all describe the action as lifting or removing the last block, not imposing another one.nytimes.comnytimes.comJudge Allows Postal Service Effort to Restrict Mail Voting, for Now
npr.orgnpr.orgJudge clears the way for Postal Service work on Trump's mail-in voting order for...+3 more
The sequence described in the sources is that Judge Indira Talwani initially blocked key portions of President Trump’s order in late June, finding that the provisions involving the Postal Service and the Department of Homeland Security exceeded constitutional limits. The Supreme Court later paused that lower-court ruling, and Talwani subsequently lifted the freeze after the Supreme Court’s intervention. Those earlier decisions explain the reference to a prior block, but they do not support the claim that the judge again imposed a 14-day hold.nytimes.comnytimes.comWhere Does Trump’s Effort to Restrict Mail Voting Stand?
npr.orgnpr.orgSupreme Court halts a ruling on Trump mail voting order : NPR+2 more
The supplied material also does not establish that the Postal Service had finalized rules immediately before a new 14-day judicial hold. Instead, NPR describes the rules as containing a provision that would allow implementation for this year’s elections if the injunctions were lifted, while its account of the Aug. 26 ruling says the judge cleared the way for Postal Service work. The claim reverses the latest reported legal outcome and adds a 14-day detail that is not supported by any provided source.nytimes.comnytimes.comJudge Allows Postal Service Effort to Restrict Mail Voting, for Now
npr.orgnpr.orgJudge clears the way for Postal Service work on Trump's mail-in voting order for...+1 more
As of Aug. 28, 2026, the restrictions were therefore allowed to proceed for the time being, not newly blocked. The court’s ruling was temporary in the sense that the broader legal challenge remained unresolved, but that uncertainty does not turn the ruling into a 14-day hold.nytimes.comnytimes.comSupreme Court Allows Trump to Pursue Mail Voting Limits, for Now
abcnews.comabcnews.comFederal judge lifts all blocks on Trump mail-in ballots executive order+1 more