U.S. Representative Delia Ramirez did say she considers herself a 'proud Guatemalan before being an American' during a speech in Mexico City.
U. S. Rep. Delia Ramirez said she considers herself a "proud Guatemalan before being an American.

Who Is Democrat Delia Ramirez? Illinois Congresswoman Who Said She Is A 'Guatemalan Before An American' - US News - Times Now
Source: timesnownews.com
Key Evidence
Rep. Delia Ramirez stated at a Mexico City summit, "I'm a proud Guatemalan before I'm an American," as reported by The Gateway Pundit and Times Now.
Snopes.com verified the statement and discussed possible interpretation issues due to language switching during her speech.
Multiple news outlets report backlash and political fallout following her remarks, confirming the authenticity of the quote.
What the Evidence Shows
Multiple credible sources confirm that Rep. Delia Ramirez made the statement "I'm a proud Guatemalan before I'm an American" at a conference held in Mexico City in early August 2025. The remark was delivered in Spanish during her speech and has since sparked significant controversy and backlash, including calls for her deportation by some critics. The context of the statement is important: Ramirez began her speech in English and switched to Spanish for this segment, which some analysts suggest may have caused confusion about the intended meaning. Some interpretations propose that she meant to express pride in her Guatemalan heritage while still considering herself American first, but the syntax led to a different public perception.
The statement has been widely reported and confirmed by multiple news outlets, including Snopes, Times Now, The Gateway Pundit, and others. Ramirez has not denied making the remarks but has faced criticism for them. This confirms the factual accuracy of the claim that she said she considers herself a proud Guatemalan before being an American.
Key points:
The statement was made publicly at an international conference in Mexico City.
It was delivered in Spanish after an English introduction.
The comment has generated political controversy and media coverage.
Ramirez acknowledges the statement but context and intent remain debated.
Therefore, the claim is true based on available evidence from multiple independent sources.