The claim that the Nanjing Massacre is a lie and that the Japanese were trying to free Asian countries from colonialism is historically inaccurate and widely discredited.
Nanjing is a lie and made up. And the Japanese where trying to free Asian countries from colonialism

Nanjing Massacre denial - Wikipedia
Source: en.wikipedia.org
Key Evidence
The Nanjing Massacre is documented by numerous eyewitness accounts and photographic evidence.
asianstudies.orgasianstudies.orgThe Nanjing Massacre: A Japanese Journalist Confronts Japan’s National Shame
bbc.combbc.comJapan hotelier's Nanjing massacre denial angers China
International tribunals after World War II recognized the massacre as a war crime.
humanum.arts.cuhk.edu.hkhumanum.arts.cuhk.edu.hkNanjing Massacre
Denial of the massacre is considered a form of historical revisionism and is widely rejected by credible historians.
en.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.orgNanjing Massacre denial
What the Evidence Shows
The Nanjing Massacre, also known as the Rape of Nanjing, is a well-documented historical event that occurred in December 1937 when Japanese troops invaded the Chinese city of Nanjing. During this period, large-scale atrocities including mass killings and widespread sexual violence were committed against civilians and prisoners of war.
Extensive historical research, eyewitness testimonies, photographic evidence, and international war crime tribunals have confirmed the occurrence of these atrocities. Denial of the massacre is often linked to nationalist revisionism rather than credible historical scholarship.
The narrative that Japan was solely trying to liberate Asian countries from Western colonialism ignores the broader context of Japanese imperial expansion, which involved military aggression and occupation in multiple Asian countries, often accompanied by severe human rights abuses.
While some Japanese political figures and writers have denied or minimized the massacre, these views are not supported by the majority of historians or international consensus.
The denial of the Nanjing Massacre has been a source of ongoing tension in China-Japan relations, reflecting the sensitive nature of historical memory and responsibility.
In summary, the claim dismisses overwhelming evidence and scholarly consensus about the Nanjing Massacre and misrepresents Japan's wartime actions in Asia.