More than 85 scientists have publicly stated that a recent U.S. Department of Energy climate report contains numerous errors and misrepresents climate science.
True
More than 85 scientists say that a recent U.S. Department of Energy report is full of errors and misrepresents climate science.
Trump team’s contentious climate report ‘makes a mockery of science’, experts say | Trump administration | The Guardian
Source: theguardian.com
At a glance
Verified September 7, 2025Key Evidence
NPR reports a group of more than 85 scientists finding errors and misrepresentations in the DOE climate report.
npr.orgnpr.orgDozens of scientists find errors in a new Energy Department climate report
Reuters confirms that these scientists say the DOE relied on debunked research and failed peer review.
reuters.comreuters.comOver 85 scientists say Energy Dept. climate report lacks merit
Science Feedback highlights that the DOE report shares misleading information and excludes well-established evidence.
science.feedback.orgscience.feedback.orgMisleading U.S. Department of Energy climate report chooses bias over science,...
The Guardian and CNN detail how the report cherry-picks data and misuses cited research.
cnn.comcnn.comClimate scientists file a public, point-by-point rebuttal of Trump admin report...
theguardian.comtheguardian.comTrump team’s contentious climate report ‘makes a mockery of science’, experts...
The reporting
What the Evidence Shows
Multiple independent and reputable sources confirm that a group of over 85 scientists issued a detailed rebuttal criticizing a recent U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) climate report. These scientists argue that the report is riddled with errors, cherry-picks data, misrepresents or misinterprets scientific research, and excludes well-established evidence on climate change. The criticisms include claims that the DOE report relies heavily on debunked research, selectively cites literature, and uses faulty or absent statistics.
The sources consistently describe the report as biased and misleading, with some characterizing it as a 'mockery of science.' The rebuttal from the scientific community is public and point-by-point, highlighting specific instances where the DOE report misuses or distorts scientific findings. This pushback has been covered by major news outlets and scientific organizations, indicating broad recognition of the controversy.
Key points include:
Over 85 scientists signed the rebuttal challenging the DOE report's accuracy.
The DOE report is accused of cherry-picking data to downplay greenhouse gas threats.
Several cited studies in the DOE report were allegedly misrepresented or taken out of context.
The scientific community views the report as lacking merit and not reflective of current climate science consensus.
Given the consistency across multiple high-quality sources published shortly after the DOE report's release, this claim is well-supported.
Primary trail
Verified Sources8
Open source