The Trump Labor Department has proposed a rule that could allow employers to pay about 3.7 million home care workers less than the federal minimum wage and exclude them from overtime protections, but this applies only if state laws do not provide such protections.
The Trump Labor Department is proposing a rule that says bosses no longer need to pay 3.7 million home care workers the federal minimum wage. Under the proposal these workers would also be made ineligible for overtime.

FactVerify
Source: factverify.com
Key Evidence
Multiple reputable news organizations report that the Trump Labor Department's proposal would allow employers to pay below federal minimum wage and deny overtime to about 3. 7 million home care workers if state laws do not provide such protections.
economictimes.indiatimes.comeconomictimes.indiatimes.comTrump's Labor Department proposes more than 60 rule changes in a push to...
washingtonpost.comwashingtonpost.comTrump to cut protections for home health aides, migrant farmworkers
nbcdfw.comnbcdfw.comTrump's Labor Department seeks to deregulate workplaces, cutting protections for... The conditional nature of this exemption is a critical detail present in all major reports.
What the Evidence Shows
The claim consists of two main factual components: first, that the Trump Labor Department is proposing a rule affecting home care workers' pay and overtime eligibility; second, that this rule would exempt employers from paying the federal minimum wage and overtime to approximately 3. 7 million home care workers. Multiple credible news sources confirm that the Labor Department under Trump announced plans to roll back more than 60 workplace regulations, including eliminating minimum wage and overtime protections for home health aides.economictimes.indiatimes.comeconomictimes.indiatimes.comTrump's Labor Department proposes more than 60 rule changes in a push to...
washingtonpost.comwashingtonpost.comTrump to cut protections for home health aides, migrant farmworkers
nbcdfw.comnbcdfw.comTrump's Labor Department seeks to deregulate workplaces, cutting protections for...
The number of affected workers is consistently reported as about 3. 7 million.
However, the proposal includes a significant condition: these changes would apply only if the workers are not covered by corresponding state laws that mandate minimum wage and overtime protections. This nuance is important because it means the federal rollback would not override stronger state-level labor protections. The original claim omits this conditional aspect, which could mislead readers into thinking all home care workers nationwide would lose these protections regardless of state law.
The timing and source of information are recent and consistent across multiple reputable outlets, indicating the proposal is current and accurately described. While the core of the claim is accurate, the lack of mention of the state law caveat makes it somewhat incomplete and potentially misleading without additional context.