The U.S. House and Senate have secured enough votes to pass the bipartisan NATO Unity Protection Act—explicitly barring Donald Trump from using military force to seize Greenland, a Danish territory protected under NATO.

Multiple independent and reputable sources report that bipartisan legislation has been introduced in both the U.S. House and Senate to prevent any military action by the U.S. Against Greenland, which is a Danish territory and NATO ally. This legislation is often described as explicitly barring President Trump from using military force to seize Greenland, reflecting concerns raised by Trump's repeated statements about acquiring the island for strategic reasons.

The Hill and Fox News detail bipartisan efforts with Republican and Democratic support emphasizing NATO unity and sovereignty. TRT World and Anadolu Agency also confirm the introduction of such bills aimed at blocking Trump’s plans. Reddit posts claim that the House and Senate have secured enough votes to pass this bill, though Reddit is less authoritative.thehill.comthehill.comBipartisan bill introduced to block Donald Trump from seizing Greenlandfoxnews.comfoxnews.comBipartisan bill seeks to block Trump military action against NATO allies,...+4 more

The Atlantic Council provides context on congressional efforts to prohibit funding for military actions against NATO allies including Greenland. Newsweek and Daily Mail provide background on Trump's threats and strategic interests in Greenland but do not confirm legislative vote counts.newsweek.comnewsweek.comDonald Trump Issues NATO Greenland Warning Before White House Showdownatlanticcouncil.orgatlanticcouncil.orgThe US and NATO can avoid catastrophe over Greenland and emerge stronger. Here’s...+1 more

Factually.co references Senate vote totals related to blocking military funding for actions against NATO territories including Greenland, supporting the claim of legislative progress.factually.cofactually.coWhat actions have the Senate taken to block U.S. milit

However, while there is strong evidence of bipartisan bills introduced and significant support, explicit confirmation that both chambers have definitively secured enough votes to pass the bill into law is less concretely documented in mainstream authoritative sources. The Reddit source claims vote counts but lacks official confirmation. Therefore, the claim that votes are secured is mostly true but should be understood as pending final legislative procedures or formal enactment.