The ruling has just been issued. A communist judge in LA has ordered ICE to report directly to her and radical left NGOs - not the president. This is another act of insurrection against the United States and its sovereign people.

The claim can be broken down into several components: 1) a ruling was just issued by a judge in Los Angeles; 2) the judge is described as a 'communist'; 3) the judge ordered ICE to report directly to her and radical left NGOs rather than the president; 4) this act is characterized as an insurrection against the United States and its people. Regarding component 1, it is true that a federal judge in Los Angeles issued rulings limiting ICE's ability to conduct certain immigration raids, particularly those perceived as indiscriminate or targeting specific communities without due process.npr.orgnpr.orgFederal judge orders stop to indiscriminate immigration raids in Los Angeles :... These rulings typically aim to protect civil rights and ensure legal procedures are followed.

Component 2 is an opinionated label with no factual basis. The judge in question, Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, is a Biden appointee but there is no evidence or credible source describing her as a 'communist.' This is clearly a politically charged insult rather than an objective fact.

Component 3 is false. The judge did not order ICE to report directly to her or any NGOs. Judicial rulings can impose injunctions or restraining orders on government agencies' actions, but they do not place those agencies under the control or reporting authority of judges or non-governmental organizations. No credible source reports that ICE must report to radical left NGOs or the judge herself. Instead, the rulings restrict certain enforcement tactics and require adherence to legal standards.npr.orgnpr.orgFederal judge orders stop to indiscriminate immigration raids in Los Angeles :...

Component 4 is an interpretive and inflammatory opinion rather than a factual statement. Calling the judicial ruling an 'act of insurrection' is rhetoric without legal or factual foundation. Courts have constitutional authority to review and limit executive actions when they violate laws or rights.

In summary, while there was indeed a recent judicial ruling limiting some ICE enforcement practices in Los Angeles, the claim that ICE must report directly to the judge and radical left NGOs instead of the president is false and unsupported by any credible evidence. The language used reflects political bias and misrepresents the nature of judicial oversight.