Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has publicly stated that tariffs are intended to bring manufacturing back to the United States, reflecting the Trump administration's stated policy goals.
TREASURY SECRETARY SCOTT BESSENT: TARIFFS ARE BRINGING MANUFACTURING BACK TO US

FactVerify
Source: factverify.com
Key Evidence
Multiple reputable sources including official Treasury transcripts and major news outlets document Bessent explicitly stating that tariffs are intended to bring manufacturing back to the US.
home.treasury.govhome.treasury.govTranscript of U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Interview with Tucker...
straitstimes.comstraitstimes.comTreasury Secretary Bessent says tariffs aimed at bringing manufacturing back to... However, economic experts caution that tariffs' impact on manufacturing revival is not straightforward and may involve trade-offs.
What the Evidence Shows
The claim that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said tariffs are bringing manufacturing back to the US is supported by multiple direct statements and interviews from Bessent himself. He has described tariffs as a strategic tool aimed at restoring the US manufacturing base and generating jobs, as part of President Trump's broader economic agenda.home.treasury.govhome.treasury.govTranscript of U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Interview with Tucker...
straitstimes.comstraitstimes.comTreasury Secretary Bessent says tariffs aimed at bringing manufacturing back to...
However, while Bessent and the administration present tariffs as a means to this end, independent economic analyses and expert opinions often highlight that tariffs can have complex effects, including increased costs for consumers and businesses, potential retaliation from trade partners, and mixed evidence on actual manufacturing growth. Thus, while the claim accurately reflects Bessent's position and rhetoric, the causal effectiveness of tariffs in actually bringing manufacturing back is debated and not conclusively proven.
This nuance justifies a 'Mostly True' verdict rather than 'True' because the statement is true as a representation of Bessent's expressed views but does not fully capture the broader economic complexities or contested outcomes.