The Trump administration announced plans to eliminate the EPA’s Office of Research and Development and begin laying off over 1,000 government scientists.
The Trump administration just announced it will eliminate the EPA’s Office of Research and Development and begin firing hundreds of government scientists.

FactVerify
Source: factverify.com
Key Evidence
The New York Times reported that the EPA said it would eliminate its scientific research arm and begin firing hundreds of scientists.
nytimes.comnytimes.comE.P.A. Says It Will Eliminate Its Scientific Research Arm
The Houston Chronicle and The Independent detailed that as many as 1,155 scientists could be laid off.
houstonchronicle.comhoustonchronicle.comEPA eliminates research and development office, begins layoffs
apnews.comapnews.comEPA plans to cut scientific research program, could fire more than 1,000...
The Guardian and AP News also confirmed these plans as part of a broader government downsizing effort.
theguardian.comtheguardian.comTrump administration may fire more than 1,000 EPA scientists and scrap research...
What the Evidence Shows
The claim consists of two main components: first, that the Trump administration announced it would eliminate the EPA’s Office of Research and Development (ORD), and second, that it would begin firing hundreds of government scientists. Multiple credible news sources confirm that the EPA has indeed announced plans to dissolve its scientific research arm, the ORD, which is responsible for much of the agency's scientific work.
Reports indicate that this move involves laying off approximately 1,000 to 1,155 scientists including chemists, biologists, and toxicologists. These layoffs represent a significant reduction in EPA’s scientific workforce and have been framed by the administration as part of a broader effort to reduce government size and increase efficiency. Critics argue this undermines the EPA’s mission to protect public health and the environment.
The evidence from multiple independent and reputable news organizations consistently supports both parts of the claim, with no credible sources disputing the announcement or scale of layoffs. Therefore, the claim is accurate in all material respects.