Chanel has brought legal action against luxury reseller The RealReal, according to a September 4, 2026 report, while separately pursuing an older lawsuit involving What Goes Around Comes Around.
Chanel has filed a lawsuit against a luxury reseller.

Chanel's Legal Victory Sends a Clear Message: Authenticity Isn't Just a Luxury — It's the Law | Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Source: katten.com
Key Evidence
WRKF reported on September 4, 2026, that Chanel had brought a case against The RealReal concerning allegedly counterfeit merchandise and purportedly misleading claims about authentication.
A May 18, 2026 litigation timeline published by The Fashion Law likewise records Chanel’s federal lawsuit against The RealReal.
Chanel had already sued What Goes Around Comes Around in 2018, with reporting indicating that Chanel later prevailed before a New York jury.
What the Evidence Shows
Chanel sued The RealReal in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, claiming that the reseller offered counterfeit Chanel merchandise and made misleading statements about its authentication procedures. A September 4, 2026 WRKF report identifies The RealReal as the defendant in the current case.wrkf.orgwrkf.org'How do you know if it's real?' Luxury reseller faces Chanel lawsuit
thefashionlaw.comthefashionlaw.comChanel v. The RealReal: Timeline of a Luxury Resale Case
The claim is distinct from Chanel’s earlier dispute with What Goes Around Comes Around, or WGACA. Chanel initiated that action in 2018, asserting trademark violations, unfair competition, deceptive advertising, and the distribution of counterfeit items. A New York jury subsequently found in Chanel’s favor, and later coverage addressed the damages award and Chanel’s request for legal fees.journals.library.columbia.edujournals.library.columbia.eduChanel’s Court: Litigation with What Goes Around Comes Around
fashiondive.comfashiondive.comChanel seeks $6.7M for attorneys’ fees in reseller lawsuit+2 more
Since the claim does not identify the reseller or give a filing date, it is correct but lacks detail. The newest source refers to The RealReal, whereas multiple older sources discuss WGACA and an action that has already gone through trial rather than a newly initiated case. The available material confirms the filing and broadly outlines the accusations, but it does not include the complete complaint or establish a final result in the The RealReal litigation.sites.suffolk.edusites.suffolk.eduChanel’s $4M Lawsuit Win: Is the Luxury Resale Market in Trouble?
katten.comkatten.comChanel's Legal Victory Sends a Clear Message: Authenticity Isn't Just a Luxury+4 more