The claim is mostly true because multiple reliable sources confirm that during Donald Trump's presidency, his administration attempted to release Jeffrey Epstein grand jury documents but were blocked by three separate judges who were all appointed by Democrats, though the broader context includes political tactics and ongoing disputes over the files.
Trump tried to release the Epstein files, but they were blocked by three separate judges appointed by Democrats.

The truth behind Trump's dramatic late-night Epstein file reversal: It wasn't a gamble, it was a tactic... and White House insiders say it's Democrats who will pay the price - Daily Mail Online
Source: dailymail.co.uk
Key Evidence
CNBC reports a judge calling the DOJ's release request a 'diversion' and notes three judges blocked the requests.
cnbc.comcnbc.comJudge calls Trump DOJ's request to release Epstein grand jury records a...
Western Journal confirms all three judges blocking the release were appointed by Democrats.
westernjournal.comwesternjournal.comFact Check: Yes, Trump Tried to Have Epstein Grand Jury Docs Released but 3...
Trump publicly reversed his position and urged Republicans to release Epstein files, emphasizing transparency.
nbcnews.comnbcnews.comTrump says House Republicans should vote to release Epstein files: 'We have...
newsweek.comnewsweek.comWhy Trump is Encouraging Republicans to Release the Jeffrey Epstein Files—Live...
What the Evidence Shows
Several sources corroborate that the Trump administration sought to release Epstein-related grand jury records but faced judicial resistance. According to CNBC, a judge described the DOJ's request as a 'diversion,' and this judge was the third to reject such requests. Western Journal explicitly states that three Democratic-appointed judges blocked these efforts.cnbc.comcnbc.comJudge calls Trump DOJ's request to release Epstein grand jury records a...
westernjournal.comwesternjournal.comFact Check: Yes, Trump Tried to Have Epstein Grand Jury Docs Released but 3...
This aligns with the claim about judges' political appointments. However, the context is more nuanced: Trump's stance on releasing Epstein files has shifted over time, with some sources describing his moves as tactical or politically motivated rather than straightforward transparency efforts.dailymail.co.ukdailymail.co.ukThe truth behind Trump's dramatic late-night Epstein file reversal: It wasn't a...
dailymail.co.ukdailymail.co.ukTrump turns to Epstein's lawyer to prove he has 'nothing to hide' as he orders...
Additionally, there is ongoing debate about whether the government possesses more documents that can be legally released.politico.compolitico.comCongress wants to release all Epstein files. Trump worries that won’t be enough Trump has publicly encouraged House Republicans to vote for releasing all Epstein files, asserting he has 'nothing to hide', but legal and political obstacles remain. The claim about all three judges being Democrat appointees is supported by fact-checking sources but should be understood within a broader political and legal context involving multiple actors and motivations.
nbcnews.comnbcnews.comTrump says House Republicans should vote to release Epstein files: 'We have...+1 more