A New York judge ordered the unsealing of certain Epstein-related documents on January 1, 2024, not January 2025, and there is no evidence that President Biden took any specific action to 'follow' a ruling delaying release until January 2025.
judge ruled that it couldnt be released the esptein files until January 2025. Biden followed the ruling.

FactVerify
Source: factverify.com
Key Evidence
Judge Loretta Preska ordered unsealing of Epstein associate names on January 1, 2024, not January 2025.
en.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.orgJeffrey Epstein client list No credible sources report a judicial ruling delaying release until January 2025 or any presidential action by Biden enforcing such a delay.
theguardian.comtheguardian.comTop House Democrats demand release of Epstein files that mention Trump
What the Evidence Shows
The claim contains two main components: first, that a judge ruled the Epstein files could not be released until January 2025; second, that President Biden followed this ruling. The evidence shows that after Jeffrey Epstein's death, New York Judge Loretta Preska ordered a list of more than 170 Epstein associates to be unsealed on January 1, 2024, with an appeal period for names to be removed before that date.en.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.orgJeffrey Epstein client list
There is no credible information supporting a ruling that delayed release until January 2025. Instead, some references mention dates in early 2025 related to political efforts or congressional actions concerning Epstein files, but these are unrelated to judicial rulings delaying release until that year.theguardian.comtheguardian.comTop House Democrats demand release of Epstein files that mention Trump Regarding President Biden's role, there is no verified evidence that he took any direct action to enforce or follow a judicial ruling about the release timing of Epstein files.
The claim that Biden 'followed the ruling' appears to be an unfounded assertion without supporting documentation or official statements. The confusion may stem from political discourse or misinformation surrounding the timing and handling of Epstein-related documents.
Therefore, the claim misrepresents the timing of the judicial order and incorrectly attributes executive compliance without evidence.