New England is 40% Republican, yet the Republicans hold 0 seats in Congress; let's talk about gerrymandering.

The claim that New England is about 40% Republican but holds zero Republican congressional seats is broadly accurate in the current political context. Multiple analyses confirm that although Republicans receive substantial statewide vote shares, often around 30-40% or more, they fail to secure any House seats in New England. This discrepancy is largely explained by how district lines are drawn, which tends to concentrate Republican voters into fewer districts or spread them thinly across many, diluting their electoral impact.

Gerrymandering in New England has been characterized as heavily favoring Democrats, making it one of the most gerrymandered regions in favor of a single party in American history. This has resulted in Democratic dominance in congressional representation despite a sizable Republican voter base. The practice involves manipulating district boundaries to create safe seats for Democrats and reduce Republican competitiveness.

However, it is important to note that gerrymandering is not the sole factor; demographic and political trends also contribute to Democratic strength in New England. Still, the evidence strongly supports that partisan redistricting plays a critical role in the lack of Republican congressional seats relative to their voter share.

In summary:

This analysis aligns with recent expert commentary and research on the topic.