Fact-check analysisUpdated October 5, 2026Curated by FactVerify
True

The New York Times has REJECTED the Trump/Hegseth new rule that all reporting needs to be "approved" by the Pentagon before publishing.

The New York Times, alongside a broad coalition of news organizations, formally refused to comply with a 2025 Department of Defense policy that mandated prior approval for reporting, a stance that was subsequently upheld by a court ruling declaring the restrictions unlawful.

FactVerify

FactVerify

Source: factverify.com

At a glance

Key Evidence

Verified October 5, 2026
  • The New York Times and other major media organizations formally refused to sign a 2025 Pentagon policy requiring prior approval for reporting activities.

  • A court ruled that the Pentagon's credentialing policy was unconstitutional and violated the First and Fifth Amendments in a lawsuit brought by The New York Times.

The reporting

What the Evidence Shows

In October 2025, the Department of Defense under then-Secretary Pete Hegseth introduced new media guidelines requiring journalists to sign a pledge that prohibited the collection of any information not explicitly authorized for release by the Pentagon. This policy carried the threat that any journalist who refused to sign would forfeit their press credentials and access to the department. In response, The New York Times and a large, bipartisan coalition of media outlets, including the Associated Press and Newsmax, publicly declared that they would not sign the pledge.

The New York Times subsequently pursued a legal challenge against the Pentagon and the Secretary of Defense, arguing that the policy was unconstitutional. A court eventually sided with the news organization, ruling that the requirements violated both the First and Fifth Amendments. The court found that the imposed restrictions were unlawful and overstepped the authority of the department.pbs.orgpbs.orgJudge Sides with New York Times in Challenge to Pentagon Policy Limiting...S. District Judge Paul Friedman ruled in favor of The New York Times, blocking the Trump administration from enforcing the policy The policy and the subsequent legal battle were widely covered by major credible news organizations,...ap.orgap.orgNew York Times Ap Newsmax Among News Outlets Who Say They Wont Sign New Pentagon...The policy stated that journalists who refused to sign the pledge would lose their press credentials and access to the Pentagon Broad Media Rejection: The New York Times was not alone in this stance; it joined a large, bipartisan coalition...

These restrictions were widely documented across several major news outlets at the time, which reported on the specific terms of the pledge and the subsequent institutional refusal to adhere to the new guidelines.latimes.comlatimes.comPentagon Steps Up Media Restrictions Now Requiring Approval Before Reporting...In October 2025, the Department of Defense (led by then-Secretary Pete Hegseth) issued new media guidelines that required journalists to sign a pledge to refrain from gathering information that had not been "explicitly authorized" for...apnews.comapnews.comPentagon Reporting Rules Hegseth Defense Department Access...The claim that The New York Times rejected a new rule requiring Pentagon approval for reporting is verified and supported by extensive reporting and court records In October 2025, the Department of Defense (led by then-Secretary Pete...+2 more

Primary trail

Verified Sources6

Judge Sides with New York Times in Challenge to Pentagon Policy Limiting...

pbs.org
Open source

New York Times Ap Newsmax Among News Outlets Who Say They Wont Sign New Pentagon...

ap.org
Open source

Pentagon Reporting Rules Hegseth Defense Department Access...

apnews.com
Open source
Transparency

Revision history

  1. Version 2October 5, 2026

    The original fact check correctly identified the existence of the Pentagon rule and the opposition from The New York Times. The new research adds significant, definitive context regarding the escalation of this opposition from editorial critique to a successful formal legal challenge, resulting in a court ruling that the policy was unconstitutional.

    True
  2. Version 1September 21, 2025

    Initial published version

    True
Keep exploring

Where to go next

Continue with the evidence, catch up on the week, or save this check for later.