The claim that being shot is the expected result of pulling a gun on law enforcement is mostly true because multiple sources indicate that officers are trained to use deadly force when faced with an armed threat, and data shows that most police shootings involve suspects with weapons, though not every instance results in a shooting.
Being shot is the expected result of pulling a gun on law enforcement.

Police officers who have fired a gun on duty: A closer look
Source: pewresearch.org
Key Evidence
A 2019 study found 96% of people shot by police were armed, mostly with guns.
nbcnews.comnbcnews.comMost officers never fire their guns. But some kill multiple people
Officers are trained to use deadly force only when justified by imminent threat.
spectrumnews1.comspectrumnews1.comWhen are police officers trained to pull their guns?
Shooting non-lethal areas is not standard practice due to difficulty and risk.
reddit.comreddit.comr/explainlikeimfive on Reddit: ELI5:Why aren't cops trained to shoot the leg or...
orangecountygov.comorangecountygov.comFAQs • Why not just shoot the gun or knife out of the aggres
Legal principles allow use of firearms to stop felonies or serious threats.
scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.eduscholarlycommons.law.northwestern.eduJournal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 40
ohchr.orgohchr.orgBasic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials
What the Evidence Shows
Law enforcement officers are generally trained to use deadly force only when it is justified, typically in situations where there is an imminent threat to their life or the lives of others.spectrumnews1.comspectrumnews1.comWhen are police officers trained to pull their guns? The presence of a weapon, especially a firearm, significantly increases the likelihood that an officer will respond with lethal force. According to a 2019 study cited by NBC News, 96% of people shot by police were armed, and 63% had a gun.
nbcnews.comnbcnews.comMost officers never fire their guns. But some kill multiple people This supports the idea that pulling a gun on police is perceived as a direct threat warranting a potentially lethal response.
Training and practical considerations also influence this outcome. Officers are not trained to shoot non-lethal areas like limbs because such shots are difficult to execute reliably under stress and can still be fatal or ineffective. The legal framework and use-of-force policies emphasize that officers may use their firearms to stop a felony or prevent serious harm.scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.eduscholarlycommons.law.northwestern.eduJournal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 40
ohchr.orgohchr.orgBasic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials+2 more
However, it is important to note that not every instance of pulling a gun on law enforcement results in the suspect being shot. Some encounters may be resolved without discharge of firearms depending on circumstances, officer discretion, and other factors.pewresearch.orgpewresearch.orgPolice officers who have fired a gun on duty: A closer look Additionally, public discussions and anecdotal reports highlight that outcomes can vary widely based on context and jurisdiction.
reddit.comreddit.comr/TooAfraidToAsk on Reddit: If an officer unlawfully pulls his gun on me, can I...
In summary, while being shot is not an automatic or guaranteed outcome, it is the expected and legally supported response when a suspect pulls a gun on law enforcement due to the high risk posed.