The One Big Beautiful Bill includes provisions aimed at providing tax relief and benefits to many working- and middle-class Americans, but the claim that it simply puts money back in the hands of hardworking Americans and that the Left uniformly opposed it is an oversimplification and omits important nuances.
The One Big Beautiful Bill puts money back where it belongs, in the hands of hardworking Americans. The Left couldn’t vote ‘no’ fast enough. Says it all.

FactVerify
Source: factverify.com
What the Evidence Shows
The claim states that the One Big Beautiful Bill "puts money back where it belongs, in the hands of hardworking Americans" and that "The Left couldn’t vote ‘no’ fast enough." According to the White House sources (whitehouse.govwhitehouse.govMyth vs. Fact: The One Big Beautiful Bill and
whitehouse.govwhitehouse.govThe One, Big, Beautiful Bill Endorsements), the bill does include tax relief measures targeted at workers, small businesses, and American manufacturing, as well as expansions of the child tax credit and increased standard deductions benefiting many families. This supports the idea that the bill aims to provide financial benefits to working- and middle-class Americans.
However, other sourcescnbc.comcnbc.comWhat the Senate Republican 'big beautiful' bill means for your money highlight limitations, such as the bill not helping 17 million children from low-income families who do not earn enough to claim the full credit, indicating that not all working Americans benefit equally. Additionally, political opposition is more complex than the claim suggests.
theatlantic.comtheatlantic.comNo One Loves the Bill (Almost) Every Republican Voted For notes that while Republicans largely supported the bill, opposition was not solely from "the Left" in a uniform manner; political dynamics involved concerns about angering leadership and other factors.
Furthermore,whitehouse.govwhitehouse.govThe One, Big, Beautiful Bill Endorsements emphasizes that the bill makes permanent certain Trump-era tax cuts and restricts benefits for illegal immigrants, framing it as a conservative policy counter to "the Left's" agenda. This framing is partisan and does not fully capture bipartisan perspectives or critiques.
In summary, while the bill does provide financial relief to many working Americans, the claim oversimplifies by implying unanimous left-wing opposition and by portraying the bill solely as money being returned to hardworking Americans without acknowledging its limitations or political complexities.