India has proposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. Goods worth approximately $7.6 billion at the WTO in response to U.S. Steel and aluminium tariffs.
India slaps $7.6 billion tariff on US goods at WTO

FactVerify
Source: factverify.com
Key Evidence
India's official WTO notifications confirm the proposal to impose retaliatory tariffs on U.S. Goods valued at $7. 6 billion in response to U.S. Steel and aluminium tariffs, with estimated duty collections around $1. 9-$3.
8 billion.
reuters.comreuters.comIndia considers counter duties on US products, notice to WTO shows These are proposed countermeasures pending implementation within WTO dispute settlement frameworks.
What the Evidence Shows
The claim that India has slapped a $7. 6 billion tariff on U.S. Goods at the WTO is largely accurate but requires nuance. India has formally notified the World Trade Organization of its intention to impose retaliatory tariffs on U.S. Imports valued at about $7.
6 billion, primarily in response to U.S. Safeguard tariffs on Indian steel and aluminium exports.reuters.comreuters.comIndia considers counter duties on US products, notice to WTO shows However, these tariffs are proposed countermeasures and not yet fully implemented duties; they represent India's legal right under WTO rules to impose equivalent tariffs as retaliation for U.S. Trade barriers.
thehindu.comthehindu.comIndia warns WTO it may impose retaliatory tariffs on U.S. over steel, aluminium... The proposed duty collection from these tariffs is estimated between $1.
9 billion and $3. 8 billion depending on the source and tariff scope.timesofindia.indiatimes.comtimesofindia.indiatimes.comIndia plans retaliatory tariffs on US steel and aluminium duties under WTO norms The measures are part of ongoing trade tensions and negotiations between the two countries rather than unilateral immediate tariff impositions.
Therefore, while India has initiated the process to impose retaliatory tariffs affecting $7. 6 billion worth of U.S. Goods, the phrasing 'slaps $7. 6 billion tariff' oversimplifies the procedural and legal context.