President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from UNESCO, citing concerns including the organization's perceived 'woke' policies, anti-American and anti-Israel bias, and allegations of pro-Palestinian and pro-Chinese positions.
President Trump WITHDRAWS the US from of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) over its DEI policies, and pro-China, pro-Palestine bias.

FactVerify
Source: factverify.com
Key Evidence
Multiple reputable news outlets including Newsweek, Hindustan Times, The Guardian, and Reuters confirm President Trump's decision to withdraw the US from UNESCO citing anti-American and anti-Israel bias and 'woke' agendas.
newsweek.comnewsweek.comDonald Trump Pulling US From 'Woke' UNESCO
reuters.comreuters.comUS to leave UN cultural agency UNESCO again, diplomats say
Reports also note allegations of pro-Palestinian and pro-Chinese bias as part of the rationale.
Official White House statements frame these reasons as justification for withdrawal.
What the Evidence Shows
The claim that President Trump withdrew the US from UNESCO is supported by multiple credible sources reporting on an official decision announced in 2025. The withdrawal followed a review of US participation in UNESCO, with stated reasons including opposition to what was described as 'woke' cultural and social policies, as well as perceived anti-American and anti-Israel stances by the organization.newsweek.comnewsweek.comDonald Trump Pulling US From 'Woke' UNESCO
reuters.comreuters.comUS to leave UN cultural agency UNESCO again, diplomats say
Several sources also mention allegations of pro-Palestinian and pro-Chinese bias within UNESCO as part of the rationale for withdrawal. However, the claim that the withdrawal was specifically over 'DEI policies' (diversity, equity, inclusion) is less directly documented; while 'woke' is often used as a pejorative term encompassing DEI initiatives, explicit references to DEI policies are less common in authoritative reports.
The timing and context are consistent with President Trump's broader pattern of withdrawing the US from international organizations he viewed as misaligned with American interests. The claim's components about bias and policy objections align with official statements from White House representatives but reflect political framing rather than independently verified institutional assessments.
Therefore, while the core fact of withdrawal and cited reasons are accurate, some elements like 'DEI policies' are more interpretive or politically charged descriptions rather than formal UNESCO positions.