Project 2025 calls for funneling money stolen from public education into funding private schools. This will benefit the wealthy and hurt everyone else. THEN, it calls for requiring PUBLIC high school students to take the military entrance exam.

The claim can be broken down into three main components: 1) Project 2025 funnels money taken from public education into private schools, 2) this benefits wealthy families and harms others, and 3) it calls for requiring public high school students to take the military entrance exam. Regarding the first two points, multiple sources confirm that Project 2025 includes proposals to dramatically cut federal funding for public schools and promote policies such as education savings accounts or vouchers that would allow taxpayer dollars to subsidize private, often religious, education.

This shift is widely interpreted as benefiting wealthier families who can access private schooling options, while destabilizing public education that serves the majority of students.edweek.orgedweek.orgProject 2025 Would Dramatically Cut Federal Funds for Schools. Then What?firstfocus.orgfirstfocus.orgHow Project 2025 would destabilize public educationnea.orgnea.orgHow Project 2025 Would Devastate Public Education On the third point, Snopes confirms that Project 2025 recommends requiring all public high school students in federally funded schools to take the ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) exam as a way to address military recruiting challenges.snopes.comsnopes.comProject 2025 Wants All Public High School Students To Take Military Entrance...

While the claim uses strong language such as "money stolen from public education" and "hurt everyone else," which are interpretive and opinion-based elements, the factual basis of the policy proposals is supported by credible sources. The context is that these proposals are part of a broader conservative agenda outlined by the Heritage Foundation for a potential second Trump administration. The claim's framing reflects a critical perspective but aligns with documented policy recommendations.