While declassified documents released by Tulsi Gabbard claim that Obama-era intelligence officials lacked direct proof that Putin backed Trump in 2016, multiple credible sources and the broader intelligence consensus affirm Russian interference aimed at influencing the election, making the claim that the intelligence was knowingly fabricated under Obama's orders misleading.
Declassified report reveals Obama's intel officials had no direct proof Putin backed Trump in 2016 but published claim anyway under Obama's orders.

Gabbard Releases New Documents Targeting Obama Administration - The New York Times
Source: nytimes.com
Key Evidence
Declassified documents released by Tulsi Gabbard allege lack of direct proof and politicization of intelligence but come from a partisan source and are disputed by other officials.
The broader intelligence consensus affirms Russian interference aimed at influencing the 2016 election.
thehill.comthehill.comGabbard claims Obama officials 'manufactured intelligence' of 2016 Russian...
en.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.orgRussian interference in the 2016 United States elections
Obama’s office and other credible outlets have denied allegations of intentional fabrication.
foxnews.comfoxnews.comObama denies Trump's 'bizarre allegations' that he was Russiagate 'ringleader'...
What the Evidence Shows
The claim can be broken down into several components: 1) A declassified report shows Obama’s intelligence officials had no direct proof Putin backed Trump in 2016; 2) Despite this, they published the claim anyway; and 3) This was done under Obama's orders. The documents released by Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, criticize the intelligence community's conclusions about Russian election interference and allege manipulation or politicization of intelligence.thehill.comthehill.comGabbard claims Obama officials 'manufactured intelligence' of 2016 Russian...
en.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.orgRussian interference in the 2016 United States elections
However, these claims come from a politically charged source with clear partisan motivations, and have been strongly disputed by other officials and mainstream media outlets.foxnews.comfoxnews.comObama denies Trump's 'bizarre allegations' that he was Russiagate 'ringleader'... The broader intelligence community consensus, including the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to favor Trump.
While some internal disagreements and uncertainties existed about the extent of Putin’s direct involvement or intent to help Trump specifically, there is no conclusive evidence that Obama personally ordered the fabrication of intelligence. The claim conflates lack of direct proof with intentional deception.
Moreover, multiple reputable sources emphasize that while some intelligence assessments were imperfect or politicized to some degree, the core finding of Russian interference remains supported by extensive evidence. The timing and context of the documents’ release amid ongoing political battles further complicate their interpretation.
Therefore, the claim is misleading because it selectively presents contested information as definitive proof of a deliberate falsehood orchestrated by Obama.