Utah Senate President J. Stuart Adams influenced changes to Utah's consent laws that effectively reduced the severity of charges for an 18-year-old relative accused of sexual activity with a 13-year-old, but he did not formally lower the age of consent to 13.
Did Utah Senate President J. Stuart Adams lower the age of consent to 13 in Utah to help his 18 year old relative avoid the sex offender registry?

Utah Senate Chief Changes Consent Law After His Relative Sexually Abused a 13-Year-Old: 'Will There Ever Be Actual Consequences' - The Nerd Stash
Source: thenerdstash.com
Key Evidence
"Stuart Adams. Just intervened to loosen the age of consent laws after an adult was charged with having sex with a 13-year-old child. The adult is a relative of Adams.".
archive.isarchive.isNo Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen (@NoLieWithBTC): "Stuart Adams, the Republican...
"Utah Senate President Stuart Adams is under fire after lawmakers, at his suggestion, changed state law to give prosecutors a lower-level charge option for an 18-year-old high school student who had sex with a 13-year-old.".
timesnownews.comtimesnownews.comUtah GOP Senator Stuart Adams Pushes To Amend Child Rape Law After Relative...
"The felony charge required by previous law was softened after Adams pushed for amendments following his relative's arrest.".
newrepublic.comnewrepublic.comGOP Lawmaker Changes Law to Help Relative Facing Child Rape Charges
What the Evidence Shows
The age of consent in Utah remains legally set at 18 years old. However, the law includes provisions allowing minors aged 14 and 15 to consent to sexual activity with partners close in age (less than four years difference).
The controversy centers on legislative amendments prompted by Senate President J. Stuart Adams after an 18-year-old relative was charged with first-degree felony child rape for having sex with a 13-year-old girl, who is below the age of consent.
Adams advocated for changes that created a lower-level charge option for such cases, effectively reducing the legal consequences faced by his relative. This intervention did not formally lower the age of consent but altered how prosecutors could charge offenders in these specific circumstances.
Multiple sources confirm that Adams' involvement was directly linked to his relative's case and that the law was amended to provide more prosecutorial discretion and lesser charges in similar situations.
The claim that Adams lowered the age of consent to 13 is misleading because the statutory age of consent was not changed; rather, the law was modified to allow lesser charges for certain offenses involving minors under 14.
This legislative change has been widely criticized as special treatment benefiting Adams' family member and weakening protections for minors under 14.