The claim that NSPM-7 allows the Trump administration to replace the authors of the US Constitution in determining freedoms is misleading because while NSPM-7 significantly expands executive authority to investigate and counter domestic political violence, it does not legally or formally override constitutional authorship or grant unilateral power to redefine constitutional freedoms.
With new executive order NSPM-7, the Trump administration claims the right to replace the authors of the US Constitution in determining what freedoms we will and will not be allowed.

Trump’s Dictatorial Theory of Presidential Power - What the Executive Orders, in the Aggregate, Tell Us
Source: justsecurity.org
Key Evidence
NSPM-7 orders investigations into groups linked to political violence.
newsweek.comnewsweek.comWhat Is NSPM-7? Over 3,000 Nonprofits Sound Alarm on New Trump Directive
time.comtime.comWhite House Anti-Terror Order Targets ‘Anti-American’ Views
Legal experts warn it risks undermining constitutional protections but do not state it replaces constitutional authority.
theguardian.comtheguardian.comTrump’s disregard for US constitution ‘a blitzkrieg on the law’, legal experts...
The ACLU highlights threats to First Amendment rights but frames concerns around executive overreach rather than constitutional replacement.
aclu.orgaclu.orgHow Trump's Proposed Radical Expansion of Executive Power Will Impact Our...
aclu.orgaclu.orgACLU Statement on the Trump Administration's Memorandum Targeting Political...
What the Evidence Shows
NSPM-7 is a presidential directive issued by the Trump administration focused on countering domestic terrorism and political violence. According to multiple sources, including Newsweek and TIME, NSPM-7 directs federal agencies to investigate groups suspected of promoting political violence and intimidation that suppress lawful political activity. Critics, such as the ACLU and legal experts cited by The Guardian, express concern that this order could be used to target political opponents and restrict civil liberties, potentially threatening First Amendment freedoms.aclu.orgaclu.orgHow Trump's Proposed Radical Expansion of Executive Power Will Impact Our...
theguardian.comtheguardian.comTrump’s disregard for US constitution ‘a blitzkrieg on the law’, legal experts...+3 more
However, none of the sources provide evidence that NSPM-7 explicitly claims the authority to replace or supersede the Constitution's framers or their role in defining constitutional rights. Instead, the order represents an expansion of executive power in law enforcement and national security contexts, which some interpret as overreach or authoritarian in nature.justsecurity.orgjustsecurity.orgTrump’s Dictatorial Theory of Presidential Power
verfassungsblog.deverfassungsblog.deTrump’s Counter-Constitution: “He who saves his Country does not violate any...+1 more The language about 'replacing the authors of the US Constitution' appears to be a rhetorical or hyperbolic interpretation rather than a literal legal claim made by the administration.
In summary, NSPM-7 is a controversial executive directive with significant implications for civil liberties and political dissent, but it does not constitutionally or legally empower the president to unilaterally redefine fundamental freedoms outside established constitutional processes.